Introduction to the Medieval World: Class 15
Class 15: Crusades and European Expansion
Assigned Reading:
- Hollister, 188-204
- Map: The First Crusade, 1099
A clickable map of all of Europe in 1099
- Map: The Crusader States in the Early 12th Century
- Map: Crusader States 12th and 13th Centuries
- Map: Jerusalem
- Map: The Second and Third Crusades
- Map: Fourth Crusade
- Synod of Charroux: Peace of God Proclaimed 989
- Drogo of Terouanne: Truce of God 1063
- Leo IV: (847-855): Forgiveness of Sins for Those Who Dies in Battle
- John II: Indulgence for Fighting the Heathen, 878
- Annalist of Nieder-Altaich: The Great German Pilgrimage of 1064-65
- Urban II: Speech at Clermont: Five Versions
- Ekkehard of Aurach: On the Opening of the First Crusade
- Albert of Aix and Ekkehard of Aura: Emico and the Slaughter of the Rhineland Jews
- Soloman bar Samson: The Crusaders in Mainz, 1096
- Fulk of Chartres: The Capture of Jerusalem, 1099
- St. Bernard: In Praise of the New Knighthood (early 12th Century)
- Annales Herbipolenses, s.a. 1147: A Hostile View of the Crusade,
- The Decline of Christian Power in the Holy Land, 1164,
Letter from Aymeric, patriarch of Antioch, to Louis VII of France.
- Roger of Hoveden: The Fall Of Jerusalem, 1187
- Itinerarium Peregrinorum et Gesta Regis Ricardi: Muslim Hostages Slain at Acre, 1191
- Cologne Chronicle: The Children's Crusade, 1212
- John of Monte Corvino: Report on China, 1305
- WWW Extra: Leo Africanus: "Description of Timbuktu",
from The Description of Africa (1526)
- WWW Extra:
Jessica A. Browner: "Viking" Pilgrimage to the Holy Land fram! fram! cristmenn, crossmenn, konungsmenn! (Oláfs saga helga, ch. 224.),
[At Essays in History
34/Virginia]
- WWW Link: Medieval Archery Research Project
- WWW Link: Arador Armour Library
I. Introduction
The Crusading Movement - one of defining features of High Middle Ages.
Sources - Many - Chronicles, Memoirs, Papal Documents, Feudal
Documents. We are in to a new world compared to the earlier
periods.
What is a Crusade? - A Holy War?. Hard to define. Much Research.
In a militarized and religious society - might seem natural.
But in fact a lot more complicated than this.
Let us try to answer this question by seeing what it was.
II. European Expansion
Until c. 1000 a chaotic situation in Europe.
We already looked at:-
-The political rebirth
-Ecclesiastical revolution - a period of religious enthusiasm.
Also a growing population
-No plague
-Less war
-more resources with expansion of Land
Europe still less `civilized' than Byzantium or Islam,
but now strong and ready to expand.
European imperialism - never stopped (?..
Note importance of military background of upper classes,
and progressive Christianization of all classes.
III. Christianity and Islam
Main Battles had been in Byzantium
By 11th century Byzantium was able to push its borders into
Muslim Territory.
But in Spain also, the collapse of the Caliphate in 1002
had allowed Christians to expand south. More in next class.
Muslims in heartland not really aware of any threat, but
Crusades were to condition Muslim and Christian relations for
centuries.
Crusade is a conflict of Muslims and Christians, but also more
than that. It was Christians against all non-Christians.
Jews and heretics also effected.
IV. Normans
Normandy - French and Feudal.
Tight control by Dukes of Normandy - led many to seek fortunes
elsewhere. One a pattern starts it is self perpetuating.
That's why historians look at origins so much.
England - conquered 1066
Southern Italy
-Tancred de Hautville - a minor baron. Good example of younger
sons heading off.
-Eight went to Southern Italy in 1030a and 1040s -
as mercenaries
-lost of conflict between Byzantine cities, Lombard states and
Italian republics.
Robert Guiscard arrives 1047.
Bandit leader. Then by 1059 Duke. Normans looked on with
favor by Papacy. Vs the Empire
1060-90 - conquest of Sicily
1071 - Began to attack Byzantine Possessions - Took Bari.
Bad time for Byzantines.
Normans rule Sicily well - used Byzantine and Islamic forms.
Normans very involved in Crusades.
Crusades are part of purely political/booty expansion
of feudal classes in Europe. But also more than that.
V. Byzantium
A. 11th Century
Bureaucracy replaces a military state - it looked like
Byzantium did not need its huge armies.
B. 1071 - Mantzikert. Seljuqs
Turcomans invade all of Anatolia
C. Alexius Comenus 1081- Renovatio
Expansion in Balkans and Anatolia
Alexius possibly appealed to the Pope for military
aid. Used Jerusalem as an attraction + relics.
Did not want a Crusade: Had no idea what one was.
Byzantine attitude to Jerusalem
-Constantinople was the new Jerusalem as well as New Rome
Crusades a reaction to perilous situation of Christians
in the East. But more than that.
VI. Fatamids
Fatamids 969. Cairo.
Attacks by Hakim on Christians 1021.
Crusades are a defense of Jerusalem.
VII. Jerusalem
Real or not real - Symbolic importance.
Pilgrimage in Europe: 1064-65 big German pilgrimage to Jerusalem.
Raid on Mahdya in 1087 by Pisa - called a `pilgrimage'.
Crusade to some extent incorporates ideas of pilgrimage
But that's not all
VIII. The Peace and Truce of God
What I have described so far is lots of different elements that
could come together to create a conflict situation.
But a Crusade was not just a war, it was an ideology [DISCUSS}
For Byzantines and Muslims it must have looked like a standard
war, or at least plundering expeditions.
But for the western fighters it had definite religious overtones.
This is connected with the attempt by the Church to Control
and Christianize the very strong feudal forces - and stop
private warfare.
Two movements in France [NB France has largest population and
dominates crusade] sponsored by monasteries, particularly
Cluny.
Problem of lawless knights and private warfare.
Church wanted peace, plus less attacks on it.
Kings and high nobles wanted war to be their privilege
The Peace of God
-no war against holy places or people
-POG aimed to put under God's protection the poor (who were
defenseless., unarmed clerics, pilgrims, merchants, women,
children, peasants.
IE it defined combatants and non-combatants
It defined the milites as a military class.
Later on it tried to protect all Christians.
-Began in late 10th century, but most effective in 11th.
An episcopal more than a papal movement.
The Gregorian councils and synods pushed it.
The Truce of God
Began in late 11th century (or 1127?.
-A clerical ideology of war: Holy War and Holy Peace
-no war on holy days - actually half the year
Crusades effectively diverted private warfare, and
were an expansion of peace efforts within Christendom.
Gregory VII's idea of soldiers of Christ.
[Gregory was fully part of feudal world view].
Idea of Christina Knighthood [To be expanded by St. Bernard].
Ideals of Just war and Holy war are important, and distinct
Crusade includes ideas of peace within Christendom.
IX. Urban II 1188-99
A Monk of Cluny. Gregorian Reform
Crusades were led and encouraged by the Papacy. They were papal
wars. But more than that
X. The First Crusade
A. Council at Clermont-Ferrand 1095 - Deus le volt!
B. Crusading Indulgence
-for remission of sins
-New concept. Very popular.
C. Response by 1096
Pope was surprised by response. He had offered
no plan of action.
1. Popular Response
Peter the Hermit and poor men
2. Noble Response
Especially from Northern France, Normandy,
Flanders, but also from Southern France -
Perhaps 25,000 men
Four Armies
Southern France - led by papal legate and Count
Raymond of Toulouse
Northern France - led by Hugh or Vermandois, Count
Robert of Flanders, Count Stephen-Henry of Blois,
and Duke Robert of Normandy.
Lorraine - led by Godfrey de Bouillon, Duke of
Lower Lorraine (a supporter of Henry IV., his brother
Baldwin
Italy - led by Robert Guiscard's son
Bohemund and Tancred
3. German Response 1096
Massive anti-Semitic attacks in Mainz, Koln etc.
-effect of crusading on European Minorities.
D. Journey - difficult - no provisions
Destroyed a lot of Balkans.
E. Constantinople
Impressed by Alexius - who made leaders his vassals/douloi
Alarmed at Norman presence
F. In Anatolia
Many killed at Nicea
-Crusaders killed many Christians
-Byzantine and Western hostility
G. Antioch
Got Bogged down.
Tarfurs ate Muslims
Finding of the Holy Lance - spurred on Army
Had good luck - as Fatamids and Seljuqs were at war with
each other.
H. Jerusalem 1099 - July 15th - Massive killing
I. The Kingdom of Jerusalem 1099-1291
No idea what they would do once they got there.
Set up a `perfect' Feudal state - Assizes of Jerusalem - C13
See Map p. 180
It used to thought it had strong nobles and weak king.
Now its known the king was strong for first 30 years.
Also not perfect feudalism - the nobles lived in the
towns. Many had left wives in Europe - and so could
not pass on lands to legitimate heirs.
Very little settlement.
Set up a Latin Church structure - alienated the
Greeks.
Trade with Muslims - but little intellectual contact -
which was more in Spain and Sicily
J. Knights Hospitallers 1113
Knights Templars 1119
Small armies. Strong Castles - basis of security.
XI. The End of the Crusading Movement?
Continued to 1918? Allenby's troops in Jerusalem.
Certainly throughout the Middle Ages.
XII. European Expansion: The Later Crusades
i. Introduction
A. Summing up Crusades from last class:
We talked mainly of the First Crusade in 1196-99
A Holy War - but that is not an adequate definition
B. Summary [Q&A]
Involved were varying concepts
-Conflict of Christians and Muslims
-Military adventures of the feudal classes, especially
Normans.
-The idea of Aid to eastern Christians, both those in the
Holy land and Byzantium.
-The idea of Pilgrimage to Jerusalem
-Extension of the Church's ongoing attempt to control
warfare as in Truce of God and Peace of God.
-Papal blessing and indulgences
C. All in all a heady mix of religious faith, religious
symbols, and religious power, with secular adventurism.
Once the idea got going it became an accepted part of
medieval ideology. Only very late on did criticism start.
Crusade defines much of European activity for the high
middle ages.
D. The crusades have also been seen as the first phase of
European expansionism.
This is the theme I want to explore in this class.
Both by looking at the future of the Crusades to the
Holy Land, and at other European Crusades
In Spain, Eastern Europe and strangely enough in France.
ii. Crusades to the Holy Land
A. The Kingdom of Jerusalem
B. The Second Crusade 1146-8
1. Fall of Edessa
2. St. Bernard of Clairvaux
-Great mystical writer
-Encourager of devotion to B.V.M
-politically important because of his holiness
3. More attacks on Jews
4. The Crusade - Kings take over
Louis VII, Conrad
5. Military Orders - promoted by St. Bernard
to maintain kingdom of Jerusalem.
Ultimate development of Milites Christi idea
-Hospital 1113
-Temple 1119 - based on Cistercians
C. The Third Crusade
1. 1187 - Saladin's Victory at Hattin
fall of Jerusalem
2. The Crusade of Kings - the most Romantic?
-Frederick Barbarossa (died in a ditch on the way.
-Philip Augustus, new king of France
-His sometime lover, Richard I the Lion Heart
-Salah-al-din/Saladin.
3. Failure of Crusade
Seen as a result on sin and antichrist
4. Conquest of Cyprus by Richard II
New Latin base in the East
D. The Kingdom of Acre
Nobles, Castles - development of Military architecture
E. Future Crusades to the East
There were many more crusades. But they never quite made
it to the Holy land.
-Fourth destroyed the Byzantine Empire
-Fifth Went to Egypt
-Children's Crusade 1212 - led to slavery
F. Reasons for Failure
1. Distance
2. Muslim Resurgence
Beginning of cult of Jerusalem among Muslims
This is the period when Christianity looses its
hold in Syria and Iraq.
3. Size of Armies changes
European ones remain small, but Asian ones grow big.
Eventually the Mongols where to invade the area
with thousands of troops - turned back at
Ein Jalut in 1260 by the well equipped successor
to Saladin, Sultan Baibars of Egypt.
4. Failure to Colonize
-Number who went east was in fact quite small.
-They live in the towns. Which were trading places.
-Land cultivation continued by the original Christian
and Muslim inhabitants
-Few peasants went out - no reason to go
-People did not go out on an adventure or pilgrimage
to farm.
-few women went.
In short, the crusades became a small governing class
in a basically Muslim/Arab Christian Country
Lessons were taken to heart by modern Israelis.
G. The Crusades and Europe
They were not a success.
But Europe did benefit in many ways
-not by intellectual contact with the superior Islamic
and Byzantine cultures - that took place in Spain/Sicily
-But positive benefits in growth of trade - of which more
in future class.
-Architectural impact of Crusader castles.
-New awareness of the outside world.
-the Whole theme of Crusade as a motivator.
H. But bear in mind the failure to colonize.
Population is probably the key to what happened in
the east - both its failures, and its successes
(e.g. Castles..
iii. Spain
A. Reconquista
-Spain fell 711
-Kingdom of the Asturias & County of Barcelona
-Until decline of Caliphate in early 11th century, no
room for Christians to do anything.
-Then they begin to develop a distinctively Spanish
ideology of Reconquista: The idea that Muslims were
in Spain illegitimately, and that it was a duty to
`reconquer.'
This is prior to Crusades. Has its own religious
cult - Santiago de Compostella.
B. Asturias
Leon, Castile, Navarre, Catalonia/Aragon, [Portugal]
States that could expand were the future.
C. Process
-Gradual move into Extremadura
Helped by Muslim concentration in the South.
-1085 - under Alfonso VI, Capture of Toledo, old
Visigothic Capital (textbook wrong date on p. 171.
-Period of stability: Alomohads and Almoravids
-1212 Las Navas de Tolosa
-South fall by 1260
-All except Granada which remains Muslim until 1492.
-Then Spanish move on to Americas.
D. Assimilation to Crusades
-Repeat - this was not a Crusade in origin. Had
Spanish origins.
-But once crusades got started - a general similarity
could obviously be seen
-Popes said Spaniards should not go on Crusade, but
stay and fight Muslims in Spain.
-Crusade indulgences to people fighting in Spain.
So, gradually Reconquista, although always keeping its
own identity, becomes assimilated to crusades.
-This is also helped by the influence of French knights
who would come to Spain, which was much closer than
the Holy land, to fulfill Crusade vows.
-Spanish Religious Orders - Santiago de C., Calatrava
-Also epic poetry - crusading literature if you like -
was not set in the Holy land, but in the time of
Charlemagne's attacks on Spain.
E. Spanish Reconquista a Success
At least in its own terms. Muslims probably not too happy.
What was the difference?
-Obviously - distance was not an issue, The area conquered
was contiguous to the aggressive area.
-Also Muslims in Spain were isolated. In fact when they
received help from Morocco they could stand their ground
fairly well.
-But the biggest difference was the official policy
of `repobulacion'
-Spanish Monarchs took special care that the area they
-conquered was settled.
Spanish Towns
-Now the land was not always suitable for arable farming -
so the basis of settlement was towns.
-Spain had no real feudal system to negate the development
of towns. No noble titles either.
-So towns were established all over the conquered areas
Privileges - Fueros/Forums were given which gave the
citizens a great deal of liberty to attract settlers.
-Also led to early representative government in Spain
as the reps. of the towns were invited to council
with the kings from the 1250s on.
Spain then was not only conquered, as the Holy land,
but it was also made Spanish.
-The critical aspect is population in my estimation.
iv. Germans - The Drang Nach Ostern
A. Both Crusades and Reconquista began militarily,
even if results are due to population effects.
In Germany population movement is prior in expansion.
B. Germany
HRE and Separate states.
C. Population growth
D. Method of Expansion
From 10th century to 13th -Elbe - Oder - Vistula
-Lay lords and bishops try to attract settlers
-From all different areas of Germany + Flanders
-Giving Peasants freedoms + Building defensible settlements
-Germanic settlements through Eastern Europe and Russia
E. Eastern Europe
Slavs - Wends, Poles
Lithuanians, Letts
-Resistance - big battles 983, 1018, 1060.
F. Northern Crusades -Germans on Crusade
1147 - Wendish Crusade
-But they too bordered infidels
-The Teutonic Knights
-Expansion in Livonia and Prussia
G. The big difference from Spain and Holy Land
was that the Native inhabitants became Christian.
-This meant they eventually could stand their ground
and that the area of Germanization only extended so far.
-Beyond a certain point the Germans remained in towns,
but not in the countryside.
H. Germanization of Baltic area - continued until 1945.
Combination of political control and population.
v. Albigensian Crusade
Brief mention as I will discuss it under heresy.
But the notion of Crusades other than in the
Holy Land and against others than Muslims proved
attractive - in fact it possibly sapped the vitality
of the crusade in the East.
It was most dramatic in its use in 1209 against Cathar
heretics in the South of France.
This was not exactly expansion of Europe, but it was an
expansion of the political control of the French kings and
of the Northern French aristocracy over the South.
vi. Summation
By the end of 1250, Western Europe was larger
-not in the Holy land
-In Spain and Germany and Sicily
-also Scandinavian expansion in Iceland and Greenland
-A dramatic indication of the `rebirth' after 1050.
Return to Introduction to the Medieval World
main page
© Paul Halsall, 1996.
This file is not copy-permitted.
The Internet History Sourcebooks Project is located at the History Department of Fordham University, New York. The Internet
Medieval Sourcebook, and other medieval components of the project, are located at
the Fordham University Center
for Medieval Studies.The IHSP recognizes the contribution of Fordham University, the
Fordham University History Department, and the Fordham Center for Medieval Studies in
providing web space and server support for the project. The IHSP is a project independent of Fordham University. Although the IHSP seeks to follow all applicable copyright law, Fordham University is not
the institutional owner, and is not liable as the result of any legal action.
© Site Concept and Design: Paul Halsall created 26 Jan 1996: latest revision 15 February 2025 [CV]
|